How to frame your partner (to be updated) |
My journey through the court
system in Ancillary Financial Relief. Was
there Ex parte communications (improper contact with one party) by
the DJ? Applicant alleged that she & her dad paid for the fhm but on production of my physical evidence reveals that to be false hence change of story. My mums money she stated it was wedding money in lieu & We have not needed to utilise the sums held in that account as we have had other financial resources available to us, was also false as she was using the children’s accounts, even used sums in their account for mortgage but not touched mums a/c. The DJ said ‘my mum will not need the money as I have had it too long’, ignoring the fact that mum did not have any other accounts /finances/ assets & has medical conditions or how she was living so basically made her a destitute pensioner depriving her of all her life savings and so now has rely on her children to support her so the applicant could benefit. Applicant had pre-marital accounts not utilised longer than my mum’s account but DJ did not say the same. Actual life scenario is that that older generations usually need assistance both financially and physically and people save for a rainy day but being biased and discriminating, ignored it to maximise applicant’s her take. Or are Judges not able to decide or exercise discretion on something that is not said or of reality. But he did just so on other assets. It was case of maximise applicant’s gains and probably knew in his mind that I would reimburse my mother rather than steal from her, so my pot is diminished further but did not want to say it our aloud. I believe that even if my mum was joined at the hearing he would have ignored her and made to pay costs. After the judgement, having called my mother, (I had not told her that the applicant had been out to steal her money with elaborate wedding gift, wealthy story, then changed to why my mum did not learn how to do her accounting/ legal matters, then changed to the sums being inheritance and finally the Judge saying my mum will not need the money hence adversely agreeing with the applicant’s version to take the money) and my mother said she did not ask for the money for past 3years, since finding out of intention of divorce, as my mother did not want to show that I had a chunk of money missing from my account and be penalised for financial misconduct. I did not want to cause her undue stress as she already lives on numerous medications as I had mentioned in FDR Jan21 hearing. Months later, mum said they have had notice to vacate and have to look for alternative and wants the money, as rents elsewhere are well more than the current and to help out paying for extra expenses rather than relying on my sibling paying for everything hence not saving at the end of the month for a rainy day.
Seems the Judge only read the applicant’s version that my parent’s and grandfather were wealthy but ignored why a wealthy person rent’s and wealthy granddad not able to refurbish/ repair his home but ask his grandson for money for the house/ bills. He could have handed it down without asking for money. Applicant did not care about me or my mother/ family nor the children but for the Judge to ignore facts and evidence and go with false information is another thing - collusion. He even ignored the counsel’s suggestion that mum’s money could be inheritance and me replying if that’s the case, there being X number of siblings, so again to maximise the applicant’s take. Even my mum would not have known that they would have to vacate sooner, hence rainy day came early. I could not fathom how the Judge could take someone’s total wealth less than 27times the fmh, make them destitute so make them struggle financially and give to someone that has a house in outer london and huge pension of over another 27times. This can only be classed as being biased, discrimination, immoral and helping in theft. On overseas property, applicant alleged that she paid the full sums and there were no third party interests but provided no evidence. On my bank statements production, she changed her story to ‘Approximately half was transferred from the UK joint account into a joint account overseas. This was then withdrawn from the joint account overseas and paid to the Applicant’s grandfather. The remaining’ half ‘was withdrawn from the UK joint account in cash and I believe the Respondent and I took this cash with us when we travelled from the UK to overseas. However, it is possible that we gave the cash to my parents who were also travelling from the UK to overseas in order for them to give the cash to the Respondent’s grandfather. Therefore, the total sum’s ‘was paid from our joint account and no third party made any contributions towards these costs’. This does not tally with the evidence I had produced as: i – the bank account did not exist as we had opened the account (on 21/03/2000) while we were overseas and we had never been overseas together before. How did the applicant being a bank branch manager manage to send money to an a/c that did not exist and hence the Judge believing its possible to send money to non- existing a/c as she works in a bank? We landed overseas on the 05/03/2000. UK Bank transaction of Travellers cheques was on the 24/02/2000. ii. If the money was transferred from a UK joint a/c (UK bank statements does not show this) to overseas joint a/c, the bank statement book would not show the printed electronic details but it has had written details. iii. We had taken travellers cheques and it was solely my contribution. The applicant did not make any contribution and as she worked for the bank, transferring into the joint a/c would not incur any bank fees. Applicants parents did not travel with us. About half the sums of travellers cheque sums were converted and paid that being the half sums towards the property. Rest was paid by my parents and not as the applicant states and the bank statements do not show that either, so my parents became joint owners (electric bills paid by my mum was provided but applicant stated she does not understand the language but has always got her parents to read/write the language and would have shown them the bill before the hearing to know what it was about, so more lies). Applicant then took money from my sibling for the property hence other joint owner created and deposited the sums to her a/c, making my share of the property minimal but in name only but she denied this despite the payment slip to her a/c and the DJ brilliantly ignored this as well. This the why the jcio does not want me to tell my story. The applicant had got a valuation of the overseas property without me or other joint owners consent. The applicant believes the valuation report she provided is correct (so did the Judge, her solicitors and counsel) as it states that I bought the property in 07/07/20, that would be after she filed for divorce mar 2020 after getting approval from her dad like majority of the things that was done in my household had to be approved by her dad but she told the police in 2021 that the children told her to get out to the relationship, when I did not travel to India and there was worldwide covid19 travel restrictions and then I travelled back in time to 2001 to renovate the property and the Judge also believes this is possible!. I did not travel to India in 2001 in reality. Her dad did travel overseas to renovate his property in a different town and used that on the report. I had written to the agent to question the report as majority of the report had wrong information/ description and I had stated the only way it would have been produced was by being ‘incentivised’ but the agent did not reply to me but sent an email to the applicant. He also did not reply to my emails to obtain a valuation and one of his email was bounced as non existing email address afterwards, so deleted his email a/c. If he did a valuation for the applicant he should be able to do one for me. I had even asked the applicant how much the agent was paid for the report but got no reply, nor does the transaction appear in her bank statements, so the only way to obtain it was via bribery (she said ‘her dad got the report’). The Judge allowed it as he believes it to be correct so believes I can travel in time. The applicant could not verify or answer any of the questions relating to her property report but the Judge said ‘she had been to the property’ so must be correct? ‘and that’s the only report’. Majority of the details in the technical section relate to the applicant’s parent’s property 20-30km away in a different village/town. Even the 2nd pic might be her parents property back wall. So basically the Judge implies any report even if the details are wrong, and the person that produced the document cannot verify the details, even if obtained via bribery, the document is allowed in UK court? So corruption is allowed. There are 2 pics and the second pic is of done up property while the pics I produced of the property is dilapidated and even a child would be able to distinguish from the pics that, the 2nd pic is not in the pics of the property I had provided. The applicant’s counsel also asked me confirm that the 2nd pic on the report belonged to the property and I said ‘no and nor does it belong to anyone on that that street’ but the Judge ignored my answer and believes it was. The applicant has also written in her section25 that I wrote about bribery in the email to the agent but for the Judge still agreed with the report The report agent signed off the report with - ‘The information furnished in Part 1 is true & correct to the best of my knowledge & belief - Reliance is based on the information furnished to us by the identifier and/or client’. I did not provide any details nor was I asked for permission for inspection or valuation. - ‘No investigation of Legal Title of Property has been made by us and the claim to the property has been assumed to be valid’ ownership of the property and the Valuer is not competent to verify the title ownership’. He would have got the details via the land registry and must have bribed the agent at the Land Registry to get this details as its not possible to obtain property owners details without the owner’s consent/ being present, so again a false statement -‘All the Documents provided are returned with this report’. I did not provide any documents as I did not know about the valuation nor did the applicant have any of the documents to provide. The applicant’s counsel also coincided and acknowledged that the property was in complete disrepair after my refusal to accept the report and from the pics I had provided, so not worth the price written on the report but the Judge ignored the counsel as well!. Did he think the counsel was evasive as well? This truly shows the Judge was biased and discriminating and believed the lies rather than the physical evidence, so that the applicant could benefit exaggerated value from her falsified report obtained via bribery but probably thinks that because she worked for the bank she is honest or do women not lie or because both her solicitor and counsel were white, so honest? The applicant had calculated the value in GBP using a base rate exchange rate to maximise the value in GBP, even though she worked for the bank and had previously on numerous times exchanged foreign money. I had provided a conversion rate but the counsel said ‘what I had produced was holiday money’. Is exchange rate not used to convert holiday money or does counsel get it from back of the lorry without exchanging rate? I replied ‘the correct rate needs to be used’ but the Judge ignored my replies so as to maximise the applicant’s pot again. I had been unable to get a valuation report and had provided properties for sale on the internet similar size condition. But the applicant solicitor during the bundle creation deliberately left out my documents so as suppress them at the hearing but I doubt it would have made a difference as the DJ deliberately ignored my documents / evidence and would say that agent valuation internet prices are not correct. For the childrens a/c the DJ said ‘the children’s a/c are held in trust’, contradicting what he had said at the beginning that ‘there is not trust setup’. Applicant had been using their money & I had produced the bank statements showing this and vast moved sums to their a/cs but refused to produce their statements stating ‘court not given permission’ but they did things without court permission nor follow court orders. She had stated that money she had moved was ‘uni fees’ and not discussed with me as I would object but it was well excessive than fees & had produced a fictitious spreadsheet & DJ went on-line (don’t know what site as not say) and said ‘was correct’!. She claimed the childrens a/cs I had, she nor the children knew about them but she opened childrens online and moved money to their a/c used their debit/credit card. Ignored by DJ, so she benefited. The applicant had said ‘I (respondent) opened her post while she was at work. She did not need the documents as she could access her documents at work and she kept her documents in a file and shredded the documents at work in confidential waste’. The DJ could not work this factual lie and falsified statement. If a judge cannot work out factual statement they should not be a judge. The evidence would also show this to be incorrect but the biased and discriminate judge ignored that. She bought a shredder in 2000 and old brought home from work a shredder in 2020.
She was actively looking for my documents, money and took whatever she found and denied (despite cctv) even to the police in nov 2021 (more about this on another page). They claimed this to immerman documents, some were supplied to them nearly 2 years earlier and could have filed an application to exclude these but did not but rather waited till the hearing and removed these documents including my joint documents and creating another bundle falsely naming it ‘exhibit with immerman documents’ with my other documents hence deliberate duplicating documents, so I had to create another bundle at extra cost with the deliberate removed documents which the court staff did not forward this bundle to the DJ for the hearing but his deliberate misconduct was ignored by the DJ as he used this with other allegations as me ‘controlling behaviour’. Court guidance is keep the bundle to 350pages but they had so much duplicated unwanted pages that it went over that and nothing said to them. DJ must be a clever psychic person to conclude that someone is guilty of controlling behaviour just by hearing one sides arguments and tears/cries and deliberating ignoring physical documents that would incriminate the lies. UK justice at its best. The applicant used this deliberate ‘controlling behaviour’ judgement to get me arrested as it would make strong reasoning with the police as it was from a judge and not require much evidence. The applicant had filed a non-molestation and occupancy ex-parte after I called the police after my documents disappeared after her dad and family came to try and fix the washing machine, which he did not manage to fix and I believe that if the same DJ was to sit at the hearing, I would have been thrown out of the house for all reasons mentioned here. DJ agreed with the applicant’s separation date as the applicant had removed vast sums before that so as not to penalise her for financial misconduct despite my evidence of her asking her dads blessing for separation and the dad then wanting me to pay the wedding back after 23years of him interfering and controlling in my affairs that he even went overseas and told people I had never worked but denied saying it. Even the applicants statements stated a much earlier date than solicitor date but again ignored by DJ to favour the applicant and her team. Applicant had said that I had never worked and said same to police. Will a person not working pay tax? The counsel even asked ‘I do not want to work’ ignoring the evidence. The DJ perused the applicant’s/ counsel version and said ‘he could not understand why I could not find work’ despite my record of employment & bank statements showing money going into joint a/c evidence. The DJ did not apply to be judge but would have got a minister to get them to be a judge, so would not know the difficulties in obtaining a job and judges who deliberately cost litigants are not sacked but reassigned to another post and have jobs for life. I had listed my tools to which I said there was ‘wear and tear’ and hence need new. DJ said ‘I need tools for work’ contradicting himself but ignored the need for new tools so need to pay from my share. I do not believe the judgement was written by the DJ but was done by the barrister and sent to the DJ and jcio did nothing even though I wrote in the complaint, the same. Reasons: 1. the DJ could not be bothered to read what he had in front in him but criticise me for producing evidence to protect the lies of the applicant 2. DJ could not be bothered to read the pension report that showed the pension split but said ‘he could not work out the split’ 3. my submission, physical and oral, my solicitor questioning to the applicant was ignored and judgement relied mainly on what the barrister and the applicant had said. 4. The applicant nor the barrister mentioned about her work place or her need for the car to drive to work but in the judgement DJ said ‘she need the car to drive to work at <full address>’ details. 5. only gave his email to the white solicitor and barrister, so he does not inadvertently communicate with other side 6. no criticism to the applicant and her team for financial and litigation misconduct or the deliberate lies 7. when asked to include my costs, he was caught completely off guard and lied brilliantly and was evasive, only relieved the barrister had intervened saying ‘the judgement has been passed’ to stop further lies & confusion from DJ. If he wrote the judgement then he would have seen the costs form as it was the last page of the bundle (as listed in the index) but as with most of my docs, the applicant solicitor had deliberately made my docs illegible while theirs were crisp hence trying to defeat reading and me being criticise by judge. The judge needs to give reasons for his decision but did not as did not know what to say as was not written down 8. could not be bothered to read and correct the order to reflect what transpired at a later hearing 9. signed off an order when no longer a judge and has wrong details. Begs the question, was there Ex parte communications (improper contact with one party) with the barrister / solicitor and how they know each other so as to deliberately ignore one side and treat them as inept I also sent to supreme court but got no reply. I had also contacted my local Wembley labour MP who says ‘he will fight for his constituents’ but did nothing rather said ‘if I do not agree … then I need to appeal’, so I replied to the MP ‘he also believed like the DJ that its possible to send money to non-existing a/c and I can travel in time and bribery is allowed in courts’. Also contacted a few
lords/baroness but no replies |
|